Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.vblibrarynetwork.in:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/5793
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Suman-
dc.contributor.authorMaji, Saikat-
dc.contributor.authorKalra, Lekha-
dc.contributor.authorM. Chennamadhava-
dc.contributor.authorWaris Ali-
dc.contributor.authorJirli, Basavaprabhu-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Souvik-
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Shubhadeep-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-25T08:23:19Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-25T08:23:19Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/5793-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Farmer distress in India stems from a complex interaction of economic, social, environmental, legal, and psychological challenges. Addressing it requires a multidimensional, evidence-based policy response. The present study was conducted to identify and validate expert-driven strategies for mitigating farmer distress at the societal level across five domains, namely production, psychological, marketing, financial, and legal. Methods: The study involved the Fuzzy Delphi Method, a hybrid of the Delphi technique and fuzzy set theory to systematically aggregate expert judgments and reduce ambiguity in consensus-building. A total of 61 strategies were identified using the Delphi method, spanning the five domains, which are rated on four criteria, i.e., ease of application, cost-effectiveness, relevance, and alignment with Sustainable Development Goals and national policy frameworks. Results: After conducting fuzzy analysis, which resulted in a more robust and balanced consensus, out of 61 total strategies identified and evaluated, 47 strategies (77.0%) achieved expert consensus and were accepted based on dual criteria: threshold value (d ≤ 0.2) and expert agreement percentage (≥75%). The topranked strategies included cooperative marketing initiatives, low-cost subsidised life insurance, strengthening market intelligence, provision of community centres, access to legal aid clinics or counselling services, and soil testing and distribution of soil health cards on a regular basis. Rejected strategies highlighted the limitations of rural banking services and microfinance, administrative transparency measures, government interventions in regulated markets, and stigma-reduction campaigns. Discussion: The validated strategies provide a coherent and multi-sectoral policy roadmap for institutional strengthening, technology deployment, marketing feasibility, financial access, and legal empowerment. The strategies provide actionable insights for policymakers in providing evidence-based, feasible, and integrated solutions for farmer distress in agriculture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers.orgen_US
dc.subjectconsensus building, expert judgement, farmer distress, fuzzy Delphi method, mental health networksen_US
dc.titleDeveloping multi-dimensional societal-level strategies to mitigate farmer distress in Indiaen_US
dc.title.alternativeinsights from a fuzzy Delphi expert consensusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty / Staff / Scholars Publication

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Developing multi-dimensional.pdf1.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.