Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.vblibrarynetwork.in:443/xmlui/handle/123456789/5793Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Roy, Suman | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Maji, Saikat | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kalra, Lekha | - |
| dc.contributor.author | M. Chennamadhava | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Waris Ali | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jirli, Basavaprabhu | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghosh, Souvik | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Roy, Shubhadeep | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-25T08:23:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-25T08:23:19Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/5793 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Farmer distress in India stems from a complex interaction of economic, social, environmental, legal, and psychological challenges. Addressing it requires a multidimensional, evidence-based policy response. The present study was conducted to identify and validate expert-driven strategies for mitigating farmer distress at the societal level across five domains, namely production, psychological, marketing, financial, and legal. Methods: The study involved the Fuzzy Delphi Method, a hybrid of the Delphi technique and fuzzy set theory to systematically aggregate expert judgments and reduce ambiguity in consensus-building. A total of 61 strategies were identified using the Delphi method, spanning the five domains, which are rated on four criteria, i.e., ease of application, cost-effectiveness, relevance, and alignment with Sustainable Development Goals and national policy frameworks. Results: After conducting fuzzy analysis, which resulted in a more robust and balanced consensus, out of 61 total strategies identified and evaluated, 47 strategies (77.0%) achieved expert consensus and were accepted based on dual criteria: threshold value (d ≤ 0.2) and expert agreement percentage (≥75%). The topranked strategies included cooperative marketing initiatives, low-cost subsidised life insurance, strengthening market intelligence, provision of community centres, access to legal aid clinics or counselling services, and soil testing and distribution of soil health cards on a regular basis. Rejected strategies highlighted the limitations of rural banking services and microfinance, administrative transparency measures, government interventions in regulated markets, and stigma-reduction campaigns. Discussion: The validated strategies provide a coherent and multi-sectoral policy roadmap for institutional strengthening, technology deployment, marketing feasibility, financial access, and legal empowerment. The strategies provide actionable insights for policymakers in providing evidence-based, feasible, and integrated solutions for farmer distress in agriculture. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Frontiers.org | en_US |
| dc.subject | consensus building, expert judgement, farmer distress, fuzzy Delphi method, mental health networks | en_US |
| dc.title | Developing multi-dimensional societal-level strategies to mitigate farmer distress in India | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | insights from a fuzzy Delphi expert consensus | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty / Staff / Scholars Publication | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developing multi-dimensional.pdf | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.