VBLN Repository

Developing multi-dimensional societal-level strategies to mitigate farmer distress in India

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Roy, Suman
dc.contributor.author Maji, Saikat
dc.contributor.author Kalra, Lekha
dc.contributor.author M. Chennamadhava
dc.contributor.author Waris Ali
dc.contributor.author Jirli, Basavaprabhu
dc.contributor.author Ghosh, Souvik
dc.contributor.author Roy, Shubhadeep
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-25T08:23:19Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-25T08:23:19Z
dc.date.issued 2026
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/5793
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Farmer distress in India stems from a complex interaction of economic, social, environmental, legal, and psychological challenges. Addressing it requires a multidimensional, evidence-based policy response. The present study was conducted to identify and validate expert-driven strategies for mitigating farmer distress at the societal level across five domains, namely production, psychological, marketing, financial, and legal. Methods: The study involved the Fuzzy Delphi Method, a hybrid of the Delphi technique and fuzzy set theory to systematically aggregate expert judgments and reduce ambiguity in consensus-building. A total of 61 strategies were identified using the Delphi method, spanning the five domains, which are rated on four criteria, i.e., ease of application, cost-effectiveness, relevance, and alignment with Sustainable Development Goals and national policy frameworks. Results: After conducting fuzzy analysis, which resulted in a more robust and balanced consensus, out of 61 total strategies identified and evaluated, 47 strategies (77.0%) achieved expert consensus and were accepted based on dual criteria: threshold value (d ≤ 0.2) and expert agreement percentage (≥75%). The topranked strategies included cooperative marketing initiatives, low-cost subsidised life insurance, strengthening market intelligence, provision of community centres, access to legal aid clinics or counselling services, and soil testing and distribution of soil health cards on a regular basis. Rejected strategies highlighted the limitations of rural banking services and microfinance, administrative transparency measures, government interventions in regulated markets, and stigma-reduction campaigns. Discussion: The validated strategies provide a coherent and multi-sectoral policy roadmap for institutional strengthening, technology deployment, marketing feasibility, financial access, and legal empowerment. The strategies provide actionable insights for policymakers in providing evidence-based, feasible, and integrated solutions for farmer distress in agriculture. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers.org en_US
dc.subject consensus building, expert judgement, farmer distress, fuzzy Delphi method, mental health networks en_US
dc.title Developing multi-dimensional societal-level strategies to mitigate farmer distress in India en_US
dc.title.alternative insights from a fuzzy Delphi expert consensus en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search VBLN


Browse

My Account