dc.contributor.author |
Chakrabarti, Saumya |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-05-29T04:07:18Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-05-29T04:07:18Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1035-3046 (print) 1838-2673 (web) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://vbudspace.lsdiscovery.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/135 |
|
dc.description |
Journal Home pag: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/elr
JEL Codes: J21, O11, O17, O20, Q18
, Vol. 25(1) 154–178
© The Author(s) 2013
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1035304613517988 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Incorporation of the informal sector in the general Kaleckian framework of agriculture–
industry linkage is the primary target of this article. We show that the agriculture–
informal sector interaction is distinctly different from the agriculture–formal sector
relationship. Although agriculture supports the formal sector only from the supply-side,
it helps the informal sector by providing both demand- and supply-side inducements.
Next, contrary to the general perception of formal–informal complementarities, we
rather propose a fundamental conflict. This conflict arises in the presence of the
food supply-constraint or the generic resource-constraint. Subsequently, with these
theoretical perspectives, we show that policies that are beneficial for the formal sector,
in fact, constrict the informal economy |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sage |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Accumulation by dispossession, agriculture–formal sector linkage, agriculture–informal sector symbiosis, formal–informal conflict, Kalecki, resource-constraint |
en_US |
dc.title |
The formal–informal dichotomy: Revisiting the debate on the agriculture– industry linkage |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
The Economic and Labour Relations Review |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |