VBLN Repository

The formal–informal dichotomy: Revisiting the debate on the agriculture– industry linkage

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chakrabarti, Saumya
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-29T04:07:18Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-29T04:07:18Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.issn 1035-3046 (print) 1838-2673 (web)
dc.identifier.uri https://vbudspace.lsdiscovery.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/135
dc.description Journal Home pag: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/elr JEL Codes: J21, O11, O17, O20, Q18 , Vol. 25(1) 154–178 © The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1035304613517988 en_US
dc.description.abstract Incorporation of the informal sector in the general Kaleckian framework of agriculture– industry linkage is the primary target of this article. We show that the agriculture– informal sector interaction is distinctly different from the agriculture–formal sector relationship. Although agriculture supports the formal sector only from the supply-side, it helps the informal sector by providing both demand- and supply-side inducements. Next, contrary to the general perception of formal–informal complementarities, we rather propose a fundamental conflict. This conflict arises in the presence of the food supply-constraint or the generic resource-constraint. Subsequently, with these theoretical perspectives, we show that policies that are beneficial for the formal sector, in fact, constrict the informal economy en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage en_US
dc.subject Accumulation by dispossession, agriculture–formal sector linkage, agriculture–informal sector symbiosis, formal–informal conflict, Kalecki, resource-constraint en_US
dc.title The formal–informal dichotomy: Revisiting the debate on the agriculture– industry linkage en_US
dc.title.alternative The Economic and Labour Relations Review en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search VBLN


Browse

My Account