dc.contributor.author |
Phirangi, Prashant |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-05-29T10:11:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-05-29T10:11:27Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019-12 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2278-3296 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://vbudspace.lsdiscovery.in/xmlui/handle/123456789/144 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
What happens in the art schools perhaps from photography animation etc, technology wise genetically they belong to printmaking. Essence wise animation has a different
language every ambiguous de!nition of printmaking discourses. Otherwise, printmaking
is what troubles the pedagogic discourse .otherwise printmaking taken should be taken as
an idea where the original work when it is not copied when it is not reproduced manually
or mechanically that is the philosophy of printmaking. It is what is like john Berger may
be famous with his ideas, in 'ways of seeing'. Printmaking if you take it I that sense I think
it belongs to all department in art education. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
8;2 |
|
dc.subject |
expression, mechanical, medium, Printmaking, socio-political |
en_US |
dc.title |
Printmaking: The Medium of Expression in a Mechanical Representation |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
Academic Discourse |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |